Skip to main content

Health content review

How Metric reviews health and wellness content.

Metric reviews health education for source quality, accurate representation of the app, understandable limitations, and language that does not turn wellness data into a diagnosis. A page identifies any specifically named outside reviewer when that review has occurred.

Last reviewed July 16, 2026

What every health article is checked for

  • The central answer matches the evidence cited on the page.
  • Association, prediction, estimation, and causation are not presented as interchangeable ideas.
  • Metric-specific explanations match the current app behavior and supported data inputs.
  • Important uncertainty, device limitations, and missing-data effects are visible to the reader.
  • Wellness education is not phrased as diagnosis, treatment, or individualized medical instruction.
  • Sources, dates, authorship, and material updates are easy to find.

Named review

When a page receives review from a specifically qualified outside professional, Metric names that reviewer and their relevant credentials on that page. A general link to this process is not presented as evidence that every article received the same outside review.

Questions or corrections

Health information evolves. If a primary source has changed, a limitation is missing, or a Metric feature is described incorrectly, contact the editorial team with the page URL and supporting information.